No problem with CAW (criticalartware) being focused on the knowledge
base rather than the repository - the web is the repository. (01)
There are a few threads going on here at the same time which is
suitable for a CAW aesthetic. I also a find a lifetime resistance to
artificial categorization schemes and non-complex ontologies. I have a
project regarding a digital art ontology ( dao.cim3.net ), though not
much progress because we are looking for ways to avoid artificial
schemas - like Standard Upper and Middle Ontologies and top-down or
bottom-up design methods. CAW approaches an immersive standpoint from
which to design ontologies (inside-out design, or maybe quasi-conscious
design) - I have tried a MUTE (multi-user text environment) as an
ontology design tool. You guys are using the wiki interface (liki) .
Would you have plans to use more 'push' techniques - realtime - in the
development of CAW. Push, meaning that you don't have to reload a page
- rather, incorporating a terminal interface (or shared document
format) somewhere in the 'critical OS.' It's not that I'm lazy (click
button) - it enhances the 'presence' [immersive/involved] factor of the
community. (02)
I downloaded your xml page of nodes, stripped it down, and imported it
into the Protege software. I thank you for this resource and I hope to
utilize that. As you said, the xml file can by used to create immersive
or 3d interfaces and operating systems. I hope to work on the Mute
first. Also, thanks for your visualizations of the node space - instead
of id numbers for your node map, might you put in the node names (or
both, use short names if needed) . (03)
Thanks CAW, (04)
Dr. Kenneth Fields
Professor Media Arts/Computer Music
Conference Co-director: Consciousness Reframed: Qi and Complexity 2004,
Beijing (05)
CEMC - China Center for Electronic Music
Central Conservatory of Music
43 BaoJia Street
XiCheng District
Beijing, China, 100031 (06)
On May 5, 2004, at 1:44 AM, jonCates wrote: (07)
> blithe riley (criticalartware coreDeveloper) has [strong/important]
> [positions/ideas] [on/about] archiving + preservation in relation to
> criticalartware. hopefully, when she has availability, blithe will be
> able to comment directly on criticalartware's approach to preservation
> + archiving.
>
> generally speaking, criticalartware agreed early on to avoid a
> repository function. others exist such as
>
> Runme.org
> http://runme.org/
>
> ++
> (08)
Powered by MessageSoft SMG
SPAM, virus-free and secure email
http://www.messagesoft.com (09)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://dao.cim3.net/forum/dao-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://dao.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/dao-forum/
Shared Files: http://dao.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://dao.cim3.net/wiki/
Community Portal: http://dao.cim3.net/
To Post: mailto:dao-forum@dao.cim3.net (010)
|