>>
> I forward a post from the nettime list that generated a lot of
> 'discourse' in a day. I sent a message to them before to come over to (01)
Was just reading it last night... it is sad to see after all this time
that basicconcepts still need to be revisited over and over. (02)
> dao.... but people are actually a bit lazy when it gets down to putting
> your 'class' where your 'idea' is. For me, what comes out of 'cleaning (03)
This is understandable... I wouldnt move my communication to dedicated
off-ground field also... DAO should find a way to link and cross reference
such threads on lists without interfiering with dynamics. (04)
> you room' is very satisfying in the end. It leads to the field of
> digital art becoming a candidate for grants, programs, digital-nity -
> that's digitalDignity, adulthood. It's already that for the informed, (05)
dont understand what you meant (but I am obviously non-native speaker, so
a lot of metahors and dont transfer to my jinglish ;) (06)
> but it isn't that for the 99 percent who are uniformed and support the
> arts, sciences, and technologies. (07)
Unfortunatly there is clear mix of different approaches - same taking more
context driven labeling system, some more technology, few more
semiotic/aesthetic/economic(even)... but rather than deciding on best (who
would ever manage to inplement this decision anyway)... it would be sane
to list them and see where are +/- of all. (08)
best, zeljko (09)
p.s.
Im sorry for not catching up with you guys faster but my scheduale was
really tough so I delay most of work for weekends (in hope of clearing up
my inbox)... (010)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://dao.cim3.net/forum/dao-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://dao.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/dao-forum/
Shared Files: http://dao.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://dao.cim3.net/wiki/
Community Portal: http://dao.cim3.net/
To Post: mailto:dao-forum@dao.cim3.net (011)
|